My Photo

Search


Powered by TypePad
Member since 12/2004

June 11, 2006

Goodbye to a Legend

Stephenstcroix

My world got a little smaller this morning when I read about the passing of esteemed sound engineer and author Stephen St. Croix.  Born Steven Curtis Marshall, he took his pen-name because of his love for the Caribbean island.

Few outside of the industry knew him, but Stephen had an extraordinary impact on so many through the technologies that he developed.  Technologies that helped create Darth Vader’s voice, extract dialog from the Nixon tapes and provided crisp audio to the re-mastered release of Gone with the Wind.  The Washington Post has a good write-up.

Stephen’s impact on me and his other faithful readers was more personal  however.  He started writing a column (The Fast Lane) for Mix magazine in 1988.  I began reading him a few years later and have been looking for his three pages of wisdom about technology and life each month ever since.

In 2001, he was diagnosed with terminal melanoma, and wrote a column to say goodbye to his readers. I’ll quote from the opening paragraph:  “You, my readers have been my extended family for decades.  In fact, I have never actually written a column, I have simply been writing personal letters to you since the beginning.”

Although I corresponded with Stephen by email only once about bit-resolution a few years back, I - like most of his readers - really felt that same connection.

Stephen - you will be missed terribly.  Thank you for sharing.

February 19, 2005

Brüel & Kjær Microphones

BandkmicBrüel & Kjær has spun-off its pro-audio division - and thank God they did.  The new company is named Danish Pro Audio or 'DPA' which we Americans can actually pronounce.  We had a hell of a time with Brüel & Kjær (normally just saying 'B & K'). 

Because Brüel & Kjær pro audio microphones are still out there, I thought I would post the correct pronunciation.   

Brüel & Kjær is pronounced "Brrye-L et Kia-R"

And so that those looking with Google can find the answer easily, here it is again without the non-English characters:

Bruel & Kjaer is pronounced "Brrye-L et Kia-R".

January 25, 2005

44.1 or 48?

GenelecmouseA colleague recently asked:  "Can anyone honestly tell the difference between sound that is sampled at 44.1k from sound sampled at 48k?"

No - assuming you're sampling on the same piece of equipment.  (Keep in mind that converters on box A might sound much better than box B no matter what the sample rate.)

Rule of thumb - sample at whatever rate your final project will need. If you sample at 48 for a 44.1k final format, it will typically sound worse than if you sampled at 44.1k to begin with.

Unless you can sample at 96 and fidelity is worth the trouble - for classical music recordings or birds singing for example. You'll have to downsample, but you'll have the original 96k recording for future hi-fi formats.

Different rule for bit resolution:

A noticeable difference is found when increasing the bit resolution. 20bit recordings sound much better than 16 bit recordings, and it is better to sample at the higher bit res even if you are to downsample later.

Recent Posts

Arlington Weather

Technical Books